The One Ring http://test.one-ring.co.uk/ |
|
The Hobbit 1966 http://test.one-ring.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=22238 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Dînadan [ Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | The Hobbit 1966 |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBnVL1Y2src Suddenly, any changes PJ makes in his version don't sound so bad |
Author: | GothmogtheWerewolf [ Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Hobbit 1966 |
I never watched this, but I have watched the1968 animated LOTR several times. There's also a RotK. |
Author: | ForgottenLore [ Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Hobbit 1966 |
GothmogtheWerewolf wrote: I never watched this, but I have watched the1968 animated LOTR several times. There's also a RotK. Do you mean the 1978 Ralph Bakshi Lord of the Rings or the 1977 Rankin/Bass The Hobbit (which was followed by the 1980 Rankin/Bass Return of the King)? |
Author: | GothmogtheWerewolf [ Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Hobbit 1966 |
Ah yes, Dinadan's title confused me as to the years, since I wasn't born then anyway. |
Author: | Draugluin [ Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Hobbit 1966 |
It's like the put the book through a shedder, burned half of the book, put it together again, and filled in the parts that didn't make any sense with other things that make less sense. Where did a princess come from? How the heck are the Misty Mountains now a circle? And how the heck is S-M-A-U-G pronounced Slag? There's to much to complain about this to write! |
Author: | Oldman Willow [ Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Hobbit 1966 |
Quote: It's like the put the book through a shedder, burned half of the book, put it together again, and filled in the parts that didn't make any sense with other things that make less sense. Where did a princess come from? How the heck are the Misty Mountains now a circle? And how the heck is S-M-A-U-G pronounced Slag? There's to much to complain about this to write! And some of you complain about PJ |
Author: | Draugluin [ Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Hobbit 1966 |
Oh, I still complain about him. I just realize now that it could have been worse! (I already knew it could be worse, I saw the Bakshi one several years after watching RotK in theaters. But this is HORRIBLE!) |
Author: | Jamros [ Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Hobbit 1966 |
Oh gosh. This is bad. Really bad. |
Author: | Draugluin [ Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Hobbit 1966 |
Oh no, it's Gooloom! Run, Torin, the Groans are gaining on us! OH NO, IT'S SLAG!!!! I don't see how ANYONE could butcher the names that bad. |
Author: | Dînadan [ Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Hobbit 1966 |
Draugluin wrote: Oh no, it's Gooloom! Run, Torin, the Groans are gaining on us! OH NO, IT'S SLAG!!!! I don't see how ANYONE could butcher the names that bad. Yeah, aparently it was made as a ploy to keep the film rights - the guy who made it owned the rights but they were about to run out, and to keep them he had to make a film based on TH, so he knocked together the *ahem*masterpiece*ahem* linked to in something like a month, retained the rights then resold them later on to make lots of money. |
Author: | Sticky Fingersss [ Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Hobbit 1966 |
That was one of the funniest things ive seen. Is that really real? Or is it a joke? |
Author: | Lord of Gondor [ Sat Feb 25, 2012 10:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Hobbit 1966 |
I did not just watch The Hobbit. I watched the perversion of a classic. This is why authers don't always like selling the rights to there work. It gave the Unexpected journey a totally predictable fairy-tale ending. Thank goodness such a horrible peice of adaption has been largely forgotten. A total 'Slag' heap. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |