All times are UTC


It is currently Sat Nov 30, 2024 11:06 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Reconciling the Balin profiles
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 1:52 am 
Loremaster
Loremaster
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 11:42 pm
Posts: 1736
Location: CA
Hey all, I've been thinking on the Balin profiles and how different they are. The Free Peoples profile is better overall, but I do like the Hobbit aesthetic more. What are people's views on which Balin is better? I was thinking of maybe doing a conversion giving one of the armoured Hobbit Balins Durin's Axe and counting it as the older profile. Young Balin would be cheaper, but the newest one would make the most sense.

_________________
Gondor: 2339pts
Rohan: 1318pts
Dwarves: 2482pts
Elves: 1091pts
Mordor: 2305pts
Isengard: 1762pts
Moria: 1463pts
Evil Men: 381pts
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Reconciling the Balin profiles
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:39 am 
Craftsman
Craftsman
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 11:56 am
Posts: 264
If you want a fighter, Free Peoples Balin is the way to go. More Attacks, better Fight and Strength, and an extra Might Point to boot. On the other hand, Hobbit Balin's priority ability can be huge; used at the right time, for example when Priority is tied and would revert back to the enemy, it's equivalent to calling a Heroic Move across the entire army in function, and there are few better uses of Will points in the game.

I do like your conversion idea, that Balin with Durin's Axe would look very cool. and could feasilby be used as both versions of Balin depending on the list you are building each time.

_________________
Free fan-made BotFA Supplement
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Reconciling the Balin profiles
PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 12:46 pm 
Loremaster
Loremaster
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 6:28 am
Posts: 2446
Location: Chicago
Its idiotic the order in which they did it.

The new Balin is so fragile, but has a nice special rule. Hes absolutely a support model or cheap warband leader.
The old one, is the one that they should have made for Thorins company but I guess they wanted to make him weaker so he doesnt over shadow the other dwarves.

Either way, they are both good profiles though in their own respect. I cant compare them, but they are definitely both useful compared to a Theoden for example.

The new Balin is good in a support roll leading a warband with Thorin and Dwalin.
The old one is a good second rank hero in an army or even the leader of one. Totally different styles and uses. I mean, the older is twice the points especially with the axe, which should always be taken.

Ive used the new one several times, but not the old one. Only reason being is I like making new Dwarf armies and not old ones so much. Not because theyre not good, but because people want Durins folk a lot in sales or trades so I keep getting rid of it lol.


My dream though would be to make an army with Thorin, Dwalin, and the old Balin.

Or maybe Dwalin, Dain, and Balin at like 750. Tough mudders there.

_________________
BLACKHAWK 2010 2013 2015 DYNASTY
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 132 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: