Lord Hurin wrote:
*Sigh* do I REALLY need a full formation of Phalanx? That's a big investment that I'd probably rather not make...
Even better, don't take them at all. If you want them, take a full formation, so they are durable.
...
Slythar wrote:
I don't like Phalanx period. Telchar is just saying don't expose them to archer fire. You can put them on the flanks for counter-charging purposes. If you must put them in the front then you could use the services of the Shadowlord or Khamul or you can Transfix their archers. Personally I'd convert them all to crossbows. WHF Dark-Elf Crossbows look pretty good in comparison.
Gripping Beast crossbows are a cheaper idea.
GothmogtheWerewolf wrote:
Why do you single Moranns as being specifically good against the Phalanx? All Strength 3 and Stength 4 troops hit Defence 5 the same, and there are plenty of Defence 7/8 troops the phalanx hits on the same result.
Well, I just picked a characteristic unit they'd face a lot. I could just as well have said WOMT, or Blackshields or ...
Slythar wrote:
I don't like Phalanx period. Telchar is just saying don't expose them to archer fire. You can put them on the flanks for counter-charging purposes. If you must put them in the front then you could use the services of the Shadowlord or Khamul or you can Transfix their archers. Personally I'd convert them all to crossbows. WHF Dark-Elf Crossbows look pretty good in comparison.
_________________
"... Telchar wrought it in the deeps of time."
-On Andùril, The Lord of the Rings