| The One Ring http://test.one-ring.co.uk/ |
|
| Khand 500pts http://test.one-ring.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=28857 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Galanur [ Wed Jun 04, 2014 11:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Khand 500pts |
Warband 1 Khandish King on chariot 6 Khandish horsemen (with bow) Warband 2 Khandish chieftain 9 Khandish warriors Warband 3 Khandish Chieftain on horse with bow 10 khandish warriors 1 khandish chariot might: 6 models: 27 |
|
| Author: | rigg1313 [ Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khand 500pts |
I'd say more horsemen, thats were khands strength lies. |
|
| Author: | Coenus Scaldingus [ Wed Jun 04, 2014 1:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khand 500pts |
I'd definitely call the normal charioteer a chieftain and have him lead one of the warbands: regular charioteers are very vulnerable, while one ridden by a hero is significantly more dangerous. |
|
| Author: | Galanur [ Wed Jun 04, 2014 2:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khand 500pts |
Both of your opinions are sounding. Khand do relie on horsemen alot but I dunno how that affect bow population % cause all hrosemen owns a bow as part of their wargear. As for charioteer, yes chieftain or king or multiple of both sound way more dangerous, chariot thing is that hes a monster so least 4/6 of the shoots will hit a D7 3 wound beasty which is not that easy to get, but the horsemen on it its vulnerable to die on 5+ from S2 bows, and 4+ from crossbows so I see a reason in there. Still its 25pts a thing that can be spammable quite lightly on that matter. But if was that way maybe 4/5 chariots instead, since through numbers some would eventually get to their targets... And significantly more dangerous is sort of saying, its eay more dangerous for a couple reasons: - way better fight value - elven blade - better defence and more wounds as well as more attacks - might points and fate. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|