The newbie wrote:
On the flipside other great heroes are Archer heros such as Legolas and Vrasku they can contribute to the battle without getting in the thick of it. Legolas is a great general with armour and an elven cloak as he's pretty invulnerable to shooting and has a bucket load of fate.
I guess the master said it before I can chime in. Thats exactly what I was going to say. Things like range, and the intangibles make me choose my leaders.
For example Thranduil can be in deep trouble and then keep the enemy at bay for many rounds with his special rule. At the one serious tournament I attended, my leader Vrasku survived every single game because of the way I used him.
And if need be, heros like that who have high might can get out of sticky situations even if they are soft like Vrasku.....low fate and average wounds with a soft 5 defense for a hero....
Basically with me believe it or not, its not so much choose a beefy hero or plan around it. Its more about building the base of the army.....obviously most of which you use not one character.....then after I do that, I look at that lists heros, balance spending points on them over less troops. Time and again Ive seen low number count armies with huge heros fail. Im not saying spam troops, but I meant if you build an army with Gothmog and a wraith youre going to have a lot less warbands then if you take Shagrat and some captains.....
Idk....Basically, you can find plenty of good troops for 60-90 points is what Im getting at, so I never think its necessary to have a Boromir or even like a 100 pt + hero whos unkillable.
Id say think what you want in your army in general, and then figure out your leader after....
HaradYNWA wrote:
Thanks for the feedback guys, very interesting indeed. I am currently using a harad army so I find none of their Heros are very durable (except the nazgul)
For the force I have built i only have captains, suladan or the betrayer to choose from when it comes to leadership.
I have been using the nazgul as my leader but find it very frustrating when he becomes paralyzed when down to just 1 will. Is this pretty common? Or are there effective ways to work around it?
There are ways you have to use him only when necessary in my opinion. And otherwise let him scare the enemy.
Either way though the idea of harad is to have cheap leaders and masses of troops in my mind. I ran an army at 750 pts with Suladan as the leader whos not bad. Especially on horse......but then I had like 4 captains and a ton of troops. I think 4-5 warbands with Suladans Serpent riders.....they did well even though some bad luck happened to me.