Galadhrim Knights (SBG): Already dead horses?

Lord Hurin · **Posted:** Wed May 18, 2011 2:47 pm

Hey all, I was just flipping through WD354 and noticed something peculiar. On page 51, in the Galadhrim Knights profile, it states that their horses have 1 Attack and 0 Wounds. Wouldn't this mean that they were already dead (reduced to 0 Wounds) and in turn 1, the rider would have to take a thrown rider test? Has there been a FAQ addressing this?

BlackMist · **Posted:** Wed May 18, 2011 3:58 pm

It's a mistake in the profile, it's meant to be 0 attacks, 1 wound because horses generally have 0 attacks and 1 wound. Otherwise the horse would be dying automatically...

Lord Hurin · **Posted:** Wed May 18, 2011 4:03 pm

BlackMist wrote:

It's a mistake in the profile, it's meant to be 0 attacks, 1 wound because horses generally have 0 attacks and 1 wound. Otherwise the horse would be dying automatically...

But Rules As Written...

Ultragreek · **Joined:** Fri Apr 29, 2011 1:03 pm **Posts:** 294

Omg. If they even tried to fix their mistakes they would made new ones.

Beowulf03809 · **Posted:** Wed May 18, 2011 4:09 pm

This one's just too funny. :rofl:

Lord Hurin · **Posted:** Wed May 18, 2011 4:20 pm

Beowulf03809 wrote:

:rofl: This one's just too funny. :rofl:

Oh, I know. Thank god I never bought any of those guys! :lol:

Beowulf03809 · **Posted:** Wed May 18, 2011 4:34 pm

...setting up pieces....
P1: Hey, nice Galadrhim Knights. You did a great job painting them
P2: Thanks. I spent over 4 hours on each one. There's ten layers of shading on each horse, and I even painted shadows on the bases...see
P1: Very good. You know I've never played against them before. Let me take a quick look at the profile.
<opens book>
P1: Interesting...Hmmmm...Yeah...ok. Roll priority. I got a 4.
P2: A six! I win. Ok my Galaadrhim Knights...
P1 (interrupting with a loud shout): All have their horses die!

It would be fun...just once...

Lord Hurin · **Posted:** Wed May 18, 2011 4:50 pm

Of course it would, just to see the look on my opponent's face! Would I allow him to switch the Attacks/ Wounds like it's no doubt meant to be? Of course! If someone started getting cheeky and demanding that the horses get 1A, 1W (as I know someone who would certainly try) then I'd just go by RAW.

Beowulf03809 · **Posted:** Wed May 18, 2011 5:35 pm

Lord Hurin wrote:

Of course it would, just to see the look on my opponent's face! Would I allow him to switch the Attacks/ Wounds like it's no doubt meant to be? Of course! If someone started getting cheeky and demanding that the horses get 1A, 1W (as I know someone who would certainly try) then I'd just go by RAW.

Agree on all points.

Ultragreek · **Joined:** Fri Apr 29, 2011 1:03 pm **Posts:** 294

I agree totally. Yes too funny.

Lord-Geonik · **Joined:** Wed May 11, 2011 9:00 pm **Posts:** 8

OMG I was going to buy those LOL !!! I am pretty sre thought that it is supposed to be 0 attacks and 1 wound

or am i mistaken >?

Ultragreek · **Joined:** Fri Apr 29, 2011 1:03 pm **Posts:** 294

No mistaken.

Galadhrim Knights (SBG): Already dead horses?

Who is online