All times are UTC


It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 1:53 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Supporting with ranged weapons?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:18 pm 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:50 pm
Posts: 495
Location: Gallifrey
If you're shooting into combat, which only the evil side can do, you always have to take in the way rolls.

The ring does not make one invulnerable to arrows. Just ask Isildur.

Edit: This is a point that's been made a few times, but I feel the need to draw attention to it again. The combatants are not stationary. Battle is a wild flurry of blows, parries, etc. Both fighters are moving constantly. Therefore, when an evil model shoots into combat, there is always a risk of shooting their own.

_________________
Soon the Dark Lord Knighty shall have all he needs to cover the lands in an eevee-related darkness...


Last edited by KnightyKnight on Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Supporting with ranged weapons?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:24 pm 
Kinsman
Kinsman
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:59 pm
Posts: 246
Quote:
because gollum can't be hit by arrow fire?

Gollum can't be the target, that's not the same as 'can't be hit'. If he's the closest evil model in the fight then he's hit on a 1-3, ring or not.

The special 'In the way' for fights says on a 1-3 the closest evil model is hit (this can be Gollum), on a 4-6 the original target is hit (this can't be Bilbo if he's wearing the ring as he can't be the original target).

This situation is highly unlikely though as if Gollum is in a fight and wearing the ring he stands a much better chance of wounding his opponent than any evil archer would. You just wouldn't shoot into this fight.

_________________
Titans Wargames Club

http://s10.zetaboards.com/The_Titans/index/
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Supporting with ranged weapons?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:01 am 
Loremaster
Loremaster
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 1556
Location: England
Images: 17
Theik wrote:
whafrog wrote:
No, the main point is that you are assuming you can pick which of two conditions applies. But this is wrong, because they both apply. There is no rule clarifying, so you can't arbitrarily pick one of the two conditions as having precedence.


Let me try to put it in an entirely different context:

If you are carrying an umbrella, you can't get wet.
If you are walking in the rain, you get wet.


Now obviously, you will not get wet while walking in the rain if you have an umbrella.

Hear, hear. It really couldn't be more simple!
It has nothing to do with picking which condition applies, it is simply a combination of the two.
If you are shooting and you are in base combat with a model, you do not need to make in-the-way rolls for that model.
If you are shooting into a combat, you have to make in the make in-the-way rolls for the models involved.

The rule very clearly states that you are making in the way rolls for those models in the combat, where as the first rule clearly states you do not need to make in the way rolls for stuff in base contact.

Putting one and two together, it states:
You have to make in-the-way rolls when shooting into combat, except for models in base combat with the shooter.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Supporting with ranged weapons?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 6:13 am 
Kinsman
Kinsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:36 am
Posts: 209
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
KnightyKnight wrote:
The ring does not make one invulnerable to arrows. Just ask Isildur.


I know off topic but just had to make the correction. When Isildur was shot by the Orcs it was because the ring had left his finger and the light of the Elendilmir frightened the Orcs into firing their bows at him as they fled. Thus he wasn't invisible to the Orcs at the time either... (I'm taking this from The Unfinished Tales)
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Supporting with ranged weapons?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 10:48 pm 
Loremaster
Loremaster
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 8:41 pm
Posts: 1279
Regardless of Isildur being shot wearing the ring etc, I refer back to my other post -

The in the way roll is for the combat, not the model. The Ring therefore doesn't negate this roll. If you get a 1, 2 or 3, then it happens to hit the Ringbearer, yes, but the In the Way roll is for the combat.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Supporting with ranged weapons?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:03 am 
Craftsman
Craftsman
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 10:15 am
Posts: 412
Location: Bodmin, UK
The rule that you don't have to take in-the-way rolls in base contact with a friend implies that he is free to step to the side/duck (in line with old shooting tactics: first rank, fire. Second rank, fire type-thing). In base contact with a foe, the guy in front of you is spinning around, too busy fighting for his life to step aside so you can shoot.

_________________
See my WIP thread here. viewtopic.php?f=50&t=25624
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Supporting with ranged weapons?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 12:52 pm 
Loremaster
Loremaster
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 1556
Location: England
Images: 17
Goldman25 wrote:
The rule that you don't have to take in-the-way rolls in base contact with a friend implies that he is free to step to the side/duck (in line with old shooting tactics: first rank, fire. Second rank, fire type-thing). In base contact with a foe, the guy in front of you is spinning around, too busy fighting for his life to step aside so you can shoot.



No, it really doesn't! They are fighting each other and ducking to allow the passage of friendly fire is not a consideration when fighting for your life!
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Supporting with ranged weapons?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:50 pm 
Loremaster
Loremaster
Offline

Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 6:37 pm
Posts: 1006
Location: Medway, Kent UK
Images: 1
A Ringbearer can't be hit if in combat , as he ignores ALL In The Way rolls. When randomising which model is hit in a Duel is an In The Way roll.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Supporting with ranged weapons?
PostPosted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:59 pm 
Kinsman
Kinsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:09 pm
Posts: 57
Location: Netherlands
Bilbo wrote:
Goldman25 wrote:
The rule that you don't have to take in-the-way rolls in base contact with a friend implies that he is free to step to the side/duck (in line with old shooting tactics: first rank, fire. Second rank, fire type-thing). In base contact with a foe, the guy in front of you is spinning around, too busy fighting for his life to step aside so you can shoot.



No, it really doesn't! They are fighting each other and ducking to allow the passage of friendly fire is not a consideration when fighting for your life!


That's exactly what he said.

However, couldn't the exact same thing be said about spears or pikes? Seems pretty hard to me to stab a guy with a 10 foot pole without hitting your own friend if he's dancing in circles. ;)
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Supporting with ranged weapons?
PostPosted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 5:59 pm 
Ringwraith
Ringwraith
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:05 pm
Posts: 3140
Location: Canada
Images: 4
Theik wrote:
However, couldn't the exact same thing be said about spears or pikes? Seems pretty hard to me to stab a guy with a 10 foot pole without hitting your own friend if he's dancing in circles. ;)


Thrusting range is only a couple feet max, so you can't have your weapon behind your friend, the spear head is already out in front. Same with pikes, all the points are ahead of the guy in front. If you've trained together you would know how to leverage this and the guy in front would know what to expect from his friend.

I do wish there were rules preventing cross-army spear support, as you should only really benefit from spears held by people you've trained with...but that's another topic.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Supporting with ranged weapons?
PostPosted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 7:59 pm 
Kinsman
Kinsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:09 pm
Posts: 57
Location: Netherlands
whafrog wrote:
Theik wrote:
However, couldn't the exact same thing be said about spears or pikes? Seems pretty hard to me to stab a guy with a 10 foot pole without hitting your own friend if he's dancing in circles. ;)


Thrusting range is only a couple feet max, so you can't have your weapon behind your friend, the spear head is already out in front. Same with pikes, all the points are ahead of the guy in front. If you've trained together you would know how to leverage this and the guy in front would know what to expect from his friend.

I do wish there were rules preventing cross-army spear support, as you should only really benefit from spears held by people you've trained with...but that's another topic.


Training aside, if a pike is long enough to to support your friend from behind another pike user supporting your friend, it is clearly long enough to injure your friend on the other side if you are supporting him by yourself, so at the very least it'd make sense that a friendly unit on the other side of the fight could get injured if you stab and miss your intended target.

That said, realistically speaking, you would know what to expect if there's a ranged weapon guy behind you as well. For starters they wouldn't loose their arrow/bullet/whatever they shoot until they are certain they won't hit you (although they could very well hit the guy on the other side of the fight who suddenly appears when the intended target ducks or what have you), and generally speaking soldiers do not fire without at least some form of warning to others. They are trained to wait for orders to fire, it'd be more than reasonable to assume that the guy in front of them tells informs them when they have a chance to fire.

The tercio formation was actually a pretty good example of a strategy that combines a melee front with a ranged support, breaking not only the "can't shoot into melee combat" rule as well as the far less confusing base-contact rule by shooting into melee combat from behind several ranks of spearwielders.


However, interesting historical facts alike, thanks for the answers. =)


Seems like the general consensus is that the in-the-way roll from the fight overwrites the never-in-the-way rule from being in base combat. Cheers!
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Supporting with ranged weapons?
PostPosted: Sat Aug 10, 2013 12:50 pm 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:40 pm
Posts: 297
the only one person in the whole game that can shoot in combat with out risking a ally in legolas since of he has a auto hit rule with 1 of his shots instead of his normal 3. every other shooting has to take in the way base contact or not.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: