| The One Ring http://test.one-ring.co.uk/ |
|
| What exactly is considered a monster http://test.one-ring.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=31689 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Valadorn [ Mon Dec 14, 2015 10:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | What exactly is considered a monster |
Really I can't find where in books, which/or how models are models included in the monster entry which means hurl, barge etc. In the Hobbit rulebook, it is written generally but not specifically. Ok all know that a troll is included in this list, but can a bat hurl? can giant spiders hurl? The only list I found is in the GW's site, where in "Type" entry there is the selection "Monster" (which btw includes bats and spiders). P.S: if there is something in an errata excuse me I really think I searched for it everywhere. |
|
| Author: | Draugluin [ Tue Dec 15, 2015 3:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: What exactly is considered a monster |
Their profile will say monster in it. Right next to their name: William (Bill) (Troll, Monster) |
|
| Author: | Valadorn [ Tue Dec 15, 2015 8:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: What exactly is considered a monster |
Draugluin wrote: Their profile will say monster in it. Right next to their name: William (Bill) (Troll, Monster) In the hobbit supplements, indeed. But not in the classic lotr supplements that we are currently using. |
|
| Author: | Coenus Scaldingus [ Tue Dec 15, 2015 10:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: What exactly is considered a monster |
The latest versions of all LotR-era profiles (i.e. those found in the 5 supplements: Mordor, Moria&Angmar, Kingdoms of Men, Fallen Realms, Free Peoples) all have the 'monster' keyword listed, where appropriate. |
|
| Author: | Draugluin [ Tue Dec 15, 2015 3:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: What exactly is considered a monster |
They didn't have the monster rules way back when, which is why they got updated. |
|
| Author: | Valadorn [ Tue Dec 15, 2015 9:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: What exactly is considered a monster |
Draugluin wrote: They didn't have the monster rules way back when, which is why they got updated. Coenus Scaldingus wrote: The latest versions of all LotR-era profiles (i.e. those found in the 5 supplements: Mordor, Moria&Angmar, Kingdoms of Men, Fallen Realms, Free Peoples) all have the 'monster' keyword listed, where appropriate. Yeah this is obvious guys. I am asking how to determine the monster list in the 5 supplement that there are still the newest one for those models they include. |
|
| Author: | Draugluin [ Tue Dec 15, 2015 11:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: What exactly is considered a monster |
Ok, you're making no sense. What supplements do you mean? The 5 that literally have the word "Monster" included next to the name? |
|
| Author: | Dr Grant [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 12:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: What exactly is considered a monster |
Valadorn - all the current sourcebooks include the word 'monster' next to the relevant profiles. If yours do not then you are using the older, out-dated sourcebooks. The current and active range of sourcebooks are: An Unexpected Journey The Desolation of Smaug The Battle of the Five Armies Mordor Kingdoms of Men Fallen Realms Moria and Angmar The Free Peoples Hope that helps |
|
| Author: | Valadorn [ Thu Dec 17, 2015 3:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: What exactly is considered a monster |
I am asking for forgiveness by everyone. There was no misunderstanding on the books that was the obvious part and the answers confused me. There are some models like Half-Trolls etc that I was sure that had the entry monster. After that I thought that they only corrected that after the hobbit expansion. Everyone is right, again sorry for misunderstanding and thank you for your time. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|