Jelier wrote:
Well it's an interesting thought, of having them without shields and with another hero then grimbold. With Rohirrim I mean just the people of Rohan, wich is, if I am not mistaken the correct wording. (although with an extra r ) Also because Rohirrim and galadhrim sounds like a better alliance then, warriors of rohan and galadhrim
I think however that them having shields, still would matter, because :
-the elves will not have a higher defence, and 4 or 5 def. makes a difference against evil archery and I want them in front.
-The point of taking grimbold is that I have a hitting power, with the option to piercing strike. With a probabply swarmed army, there are moments I think which are opertune to take the risk, and some which are not. I like to have that choice, without losing the punch.
Also I want grimbold theme-wise, the idea of a group of Rohan warriors who know how the handle axes brings me to grimbold.
But thanks for the idea's there is def. more to say about this.
Ive thought what you did before, and the front line heavy D guys in front of elves lasts very little.....within 2-3 turns youre going to either be able to not shoot, or have to split up if your opponent is witty. It failed on many occasions I saw. And yes, you will be swarmed. Thats why I suggested what I did.
With no shields, your whole army with be D4. Evil bows are all strength two. The difference between D5 and D6 is nothing when they roll to wound you.
UNLESS, you face Uruk Crossbows....
You can do what you want but youre shooting yourself in the foot by not taking Erkenbrand. Grimbold is a weak hero.